Who needs levels anyway?

Do you miss levels? I bet you do. I bet you miss the way they allowed you to carve up learning into bite-size chunks of certainty. Not to mention the ease by which they helped you measure progress, and we’re not talking about the kind of progress you see in books, goodness me no, we’re talking about progress along a made up scale. Yep, levels sure were helpful. But now they’re gone.

What are we going to do?

That’s a really good question and one that we’re really happy to answer.

Firstly, don’t worry. Because at ‘Targeted Innovation Tracking Systems’ (TITS) we’ve done the hard work for you. Let us explain how you can use our friendly and easy to understand system of assessments to become the teacher you never knew you couldn’t be.

First we took the national curriculum and cut up each subject into easy to understand categories that we call ‘learning themes’. Each learning theme has then been divided up into bite-size and manageable learning points that we call ‘outcome goals’. Each learning theme contains around 36 outcome goals and these have been carefully differentiated or ‘layered’ across every year group to make it easier. In total there are approximately 275 outcome goals per subject and to make things even easier we have broken them up into levels of importance: these are your ‘test likely’ outcome goals and we recommend you focus on these first.

But how do I actually know if a child has achieved an outcome goal?

That’s a really good question and one that we’re really happy to answer.

We believe that TITS should be user friendly. So we’ve created a brand new, and not like levels, system of assessment. For each outcome goal there are four stages of understanding that a child will go through from novice to master (we are fully mastery curriculum accredited):

A. Missed the net – the child cannot do this at all, the ball is too heavy and the goal is too small and far away.

B. Kicked it – the child has tried and their learning ball is starting to move in the right direction.

C. Back of the net – the child has scored, brilliant learning.

D. Instant replay – the child has reviewed their learning in slow motion and is now a premiership learner.

We believe that this simple 4 step system appeals to children because it is based on playing games. Incidentally TITS also provide pupil goal cards, stickers, wall charts, fridge magnets and hanging mobiles and it is possible to use the school’s sports premium money to pay for the subscription.

Each outcome goal step has also been sub-divided into three categories that allow for additional fine tuning by the teacher. This is a deeper level of teacher assessment that is easy to understand and use:

  1. A.1 Cold A.2 Tepid A.3 Hot
  2. B.1 Cold B.2 Tepid B.3 Hot
  3. C.1 Cold C.2 Tepid C.3 Hot
  4. D.1 Cold D.2 Tepid D.3 Hot

This deeper level allows for greater teacher autonomy when assessing children. It should be used daily in order to inform your planning.

This all sounds really easy and sensible but how do I actually assess?

That’s a really good question and one that we’re really happy to answer.

The best TITS are electronic and our TITS are no exception. Once you log on to your class each of your pupils will be displayed. Simply click on their name and click on all the correct outcome goal steps. This will then provide you with a best fit assessment indicator. For example, in reading the assessment indicator will be prefaced by the letter R followed by the learning theme followed by the outcome goal followed by the outcome step followed by the deep level teacher assessment: R-comp-25-C-2. This, as you can probably tell, means that in comprehension, the child has achieved, to some degree, some knowledge and understanding appropriate for their age.

Once all the outcome goals have been assessed TITS will provide you with an overall score for that child. The overall score system amalgamates all the precise data inputted by the teacher and gives a best-fit assessment based on the child’s age. In Year 3 for example, a child can score anywhere between 7 and 8 up to two decimal places because that’s how old and how good a Year 3 child can be. At the end of Year 3, a child with a score of 7.11 is not achieving whereas a child with a score of 8.89 is achieving really well. It’s so simple and easy to use and works all the way through the school.

How do I start?

That’s a really good question and one that we’re really happy to answer.

Even though levels have gone and have no place within the new curriculum, we still think it’s important to implant your old levels data into the new system to help get you started. A TITS implant is a simple one click procedure that will provide you with an estimated new assessment. Below are some key conversions to help you get started.

Old    TITS

2B    7.5

4B    11.5

From this you can see a simple progress measure that we call our ‘expected upwards trajectory aim’. This expected upwards trajectory aim allows you to set targets and review progress in a way that is meaningful and easy to understand. TITS will also automatically light up if a child is not making their expected trajectory allowing teachers to target key pupils through the outcome goal section tool.

As you can see, levels may be dead, but there’s definitely life after levels. We hope that you agree and more importantly, we hope you like our TITS.

Reservoir horologists

JPEG_20151019_011735_-29294377-1

You’re asking me how the watch is made. For now just keep an eye on the time.

Alejandro Gillick [Sicario – 2015]

Leading a school is like taking a dog for a walk in the rain. You know the dog needs exercise so you vow to commit to the walk no matter what the conditions are like outside. You prepare, in advance, for every eventuality you can think of to safeguard both yourself and the pooch along the way. During the walk, you try to remain in control of the lumbering beast that is pulling away at every opportunity whilst getting distracted by everything around it. At some point during walkies you let the dog off the lead, assuming it can be trusted, and, before you know it, it has let you down in some unbelievably stupid manner that is going to take a lot of explaining when you get home. Finally, you return from the walk (which has taken far longer than you anticipated), wet, muddy, totally exhausted and your pockets full of excrement.

If you’re wondering what the dog represents in this metaphor, take your pick. Either way, it’s messy.

I suppose, where the metaphor falls down is that neither before nor during a dog walk do you have a variety of stakeholders scrutinising every step you make. No one is interested in how you take the dog for a walk; all anybody will care about is whether the dog a) eats; b) treads on; c) tries to have sex with, anything of theirs that they hold dear. The same cannot be said for running a school.

There are a plethora of folk whose sole desire is to check whether a school is doing their job. They concern themselves with what schools and their leaders are up to. They come in, look around, see what’s going on, ask a few questions…all in the hope that you won’t be left standing with any more poo in your pocket than is reasonably necessary. Knowledgeable, helpful, and always offering a considered word to the wise. These people know when to stand back and wait for the chips to fall. They recognise that outcomes, although not the be all and end all, are still vital signs.

For others, however, the end result seems to be the last thing on their mind. Some checkers seem to have an obsession with the how you’re doing it rather than what good it has done. The outcomes are almost irrelevant, as in, good outcomes can be ignored and written off as an accident or not worth exploring, whilst bad outcomes merely support their overwhelming sense of entitlement to get stuck in.

And by getting ‘stuck in’ I mean they have a desire to not only understand, but to be involved in and therefore (in their minds) improve, every minute detail of school operations. Every system is in danger of being dissected, analysed, advised upon, added to and stitched back together so that it resembles a Frankenstein’s monster of what went before it. A mishmash of people’s opinions, biases, past glories and, worst of all, easy to evidence ideas that they can check up on later.

These critical friends/challenge partners/ball breakers/accountability gibbons needlessly delve into elements of school business that they genuinely need not concern themselves with and, in a desperate bid to grasp the big picture, end up looking through the wrong end of the telescope. The concept that the school, having been successful in some areas, could therefore be successful in others, is alien. Areas to develop are proof that the school has not yet done enough and so why shouldn’t schools be treated as though they have done nothing at all. Trust, acknowledgement, respect, professional courtesy are not terms these people are comfortable with, plus, it’s easier to ‘challenge’ by being destructive. And too often that all important ‘c’ word is misunderstood by those that bandy it around the most.

And this is where the pace of school life is a real detriment. For these people are often not actually based in schools so they have a distorted, time-lapsed view of school progress. They are concerned that whilst they were away the school moved things on – but that wasn’t part of the plan – although they are equally alarmed when things take time. These people are pro-actively reactive. Over-fixating on grappling with how the school is meant to work and panicking when things don’t go smoothly; at times, blaming schools for life getting in the way of their best laid plans, or judging decisions that they weren’t part of too harshly. They are ultimately ignorant of schools’ complexities, for, in a land of grey, they are only armed with a black or white brush. For them, schools will never be able to do enough but they will expect the earth.

They are the blind watchmakers, fumbling around the inside mechanism and yet unable to tell the time.

Teach the future…today!

Expert: Look into my crystal balls.

Policy Maker: Brilliant, I love this. You literally have no idea how much this will help me out in tomorrow’s meeting.

Teacher: I’ve got a bad feeling about this.

Expert: Let us look and see what the future holds.

Policy Maker: Let me see, let me see, let me see! Am I in a bigger office?

Expert: Let’s see. Ooh, the future is very different.

Teacher: Is it? Is it really? And how exactly?

Expert: Oh, the jobs of the future are very different to the ones of today.

Policy Maker: Oh no, really? Are there still policy makers?

Expert: I think so.

Policy Maker: Thank goodness. What else?

Teacher: Yes, what else?

Expert: Well, there are robots.

Teacher: Robots?

Expert: Yes. There are maybe robots.

Teacher: And what are these robots doing?

Expert: Well, it’s difficult to say, it’s the future. But there are definitely maybe robots.

Policy Maker: Are they making policies?

Expert: No.

Policy Maker: Oh thank goodness.

Expert: Who knows what they’re doing, but they’re doing something. Something that we used to do, so who knows what we will be doing instead.

Teacher: Well, you’re the one with the crystal balls. Can’t you be a little bit more specific?

Expert: People are living longer.

Teacher: Obviously.

Expert: But who knows how many of them will have jobs? Maybe the robots will do most of the jobs that we currently know about? Maybe only 50% of the human population will be able to earn enough money to live on?

Policy Maker: To be fair, the chancellor is doing a pretty good job of covering that himself without the needs of robots. They’re not foreign robots are they?

Teacher: So what skills, aside from robot maintenance, do you see being utilized within the workforce?

Expert: Skills that we could not possibly understand.

Teacher: Well this was fun, I’m off now to have a conversation with people who aren’t idiots.

Expert: But skills that we must prepare our children for?

Policy Maker: Good point.

Teacher: Hang on.

Expert: There is a real need for joined up thinking.

Policy Maker: Joined. Up. Thinking…

Teacher: Whoa there! Let’s begin with some actual thinking first; we can move on to joined up thinking when we’re good and ready.

Expert: Schools are acting too slowly. They are behind the curve.

Teacher: What curve?

Expert: The curve of the future. Schools are not teaching the skills of the future.

Policy Maker: I knew it.

Teacher: I’m sorry. What skills for what jobs?

Policy Maker: The jobs that the robots aren’t doing?

Teacher: Which are?

Expert: People will live to be over a hundred in the future. They may need to find work in forty different types of jobs spanning ten different careers before they retire to die.

Policy Maker: Schools should be equipping our children with these skills.

Teacher: What bloody skills?

Policy Maker: A portfolio of skills.

Teacher: That doesn’t mean anything.

Expert: We should be asking the children.

Policy Maker: Brilliant. Yes. Schools should be asking the children about what skills they think they’ll need in the future. We’ll call it the ‘future skills portfolio’.

Teacher: Stop saying portfolio.

Expert: You must get this right.

Policy Maker: Yes. Schools must get this right. Or else the future will be their fault.

Teacher: And if the future is fine?

Policy Maker: Then I have done my job.

Expert: And as long as there’s a future, I’ll always be an expert.

(If you think I’m joking)